The use of social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, is replacing face-to-face contact with many people. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Social networks, such as Facebook and Twitter, have become more well known over the days. An immense number of people frequently access them to socialize with their relatives, acquaintances, and even strangers. These platforms substitute for contacting directly, so that some hazards may occur. As long as they are accessed wisely, more positive benefits can be gained.
It is not always true that social sites mitigate the quality of people’s communication. Conversely, such media accommodate people to adequate knowledge in relation to their passion. To illustrate, one of the examples of social networks, Facebook, provides a group feature which can be utilized to discuss with other users interesting common matters. By this service, people do not need to arrange a certain place and time for sharing. Without interrupting important activities, people still have occasion to read and comment on recent topics. Moreover, the discussion can be optimized from more origins without many restrictions to get wider knowledge from several points of view.
Masses believe that social media can waste their productive time, by surfering in intelligent ways, but many benefits can be gained. For example, by the popularity of these tools, traders can advertise commerce more widely. Besides, instead of allocating their financial capital for building or renting a shop, many entrepreneurs prefer to sell their commodity virtually, which is more inexpensive and even sometimes free. Furthermore, it may be more pleasurable for customers to browse and order necessities by only accessing the company’s pages rather than wasting much time and energy to go shopping. Thus, online media makes the transactions appealing.
To conclude, social media have played essential roles in peoples’ activities. Even though excessive online socialization may affect negative influence, providing that we use them properly, it can enhance our lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...knowledge from several points of view. Masses believe that social media can was...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, furthermore, may, moreover, so, still, thus, well, even so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65529010239 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98083743142 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662116040956 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6795991441 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4705882353 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2352941176 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14749056107 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483790369729 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400473739657 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949983276344 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024820598605 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.