In the days of old, people made buying and selling just at a minimum. But now most people care about shopping as if it were an activity. I strongly believe that it is not a positive trend and my opinion will be explained in the following paragraphs.
It is no doubt true that in the past decades, consumers who did not have sort of choice could not spend unnecessary expenses and so they learned to doing with less. Contrary to this, today's people have numerous options and lost themselves in these alternatives. For instance, even if there are dresses which have generally same color and model, most people fill their closets with clothes. Another reason why nowadays people behave like addicted is increasing of interesting advertisements and a lot of people follow these ads for not to be left behind. They keep getting things constantly even if they do not require most of them. On the one hand, especially parent buy numerous toys to their children though they do not need. It can be cause negative effects on kids like dissatisfaction, want more, etc.
On the other hand, we live in the modern globalization era and the internet can ensure more possibility to marketing even if you sit at home. The internet gives people the chance to shop online and this increases our shopping frenzy. In the near future, all of these overconsumptions will be able to waste and depletion of resources and our environment.
To sum up, from all reasons above I strongly believe that people should self their marketing habit and they should not spend their money to buy redundant goods. Therefore, both themselves and natural resources will be saved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 735, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...hildren though they do not need. It can be cause negative effects on kids like dissatisf...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, for instance, no doubt, sort of, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82269503546 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69546469146 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.856786363 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6666666667 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146846239735 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472909410453 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397153958113 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0832080379425 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373620282043 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.