The given illustrations delineate layout of the development of a village park over a ten-year period. Overall, it can be clearly seen that while the total area of the park has remained stable. Additionally, many things have been made and the radical changes have taken place over the given period.
According to the first map, the park had a few distinctive facilities. Firstly, a football pitch was located in the centre of the park and on the north-west of the pitch was a car park for maximum 20 cars. On the right of the entrance was tennis courts. In addition to that, a children play area was stimulated in right and there were a pond and woods located in the just south-east of the pitch.
The second map shows that capacity of the car park has extended to 50 cars and also the number of tennis courts has doubled. Besides the old children play area has developed with a soft play area and toilets have been added towards to north side of the play areas. While a picnic area has been placed on the south-west side of the pitch, the pond and woods have bee n demolished and replaced with boating lake and cafe.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48529411765 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40583421177 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6442950605 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193517220178 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811685274699 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911035397382 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123962854165 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421323758277 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.