The maps show the village park 10 years ago and the village park now
These two maps clearly exhibit the alteration happening in a particular park during the past ten years. It is obvious that this park has been modernized and become much more crowded than before, with more entertainment facilities but less spare space.
To be more specific, although the entrance is still in north west corner of the park, a new cycle path has been constructed outside the park in the clockwise. However, the wooded field which is located in the south east of the park , has been removed and reused for the toilet and cafe. Besides, the football pitch is still right in the center of the park in the last ten years.
Moving to the car work, it has been upgraded to hold approximately 50 people. The tennis court and children play area both have been developed and expanded with two additional tennis courts and a children soft play ground respectively. In addition, the original pond, to the south of the football pitch, also has been utilized as the bloating lake, and a picnic area has been built right next to the car park.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...is located in the south east of the park , has been removed and reused for the toi...
^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a child' or simply 'children'?
Suggestion: a child; children
...d with two additional tennis courts and a children soft play ground respectively. In addit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, still, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67391304348 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43983258715 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592391304348 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0016571554 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152045296746 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714145630061 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481882537371 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110073430759 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055224543783 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.