Social media badly impact our relationships. To what extent do you agree or disagree
It is undoubtedly that state-of-the-art technological improvement has revolutionized our lives. Some people believe it has negative impacts on our social relationships. Personally, I think beside the harmful effects, high communication technology also brings us a variety of benefits.
First of all, we will begin with the good side. Nowadays, people are fond of establishing relationships through social media. For instance, Facebook is an efficient tool that can augment social communities; it is possible for everyone to find friends all around the world without limitations. Moreover, while chatting or calling online, we are unable to send each other emotions, videos, and texts. Besides, making friends online can avoid trivial conflicts or arguments.
Second of all, the negative effects should also be discussed. Expanding our social circle is effortless but sometimes it is unreliable. Many people take advantage of other’s naivety they trick online friends out of their security information or property that worth money. To some people, they are tending to undermine their reality relationships due to the overuse of social ưebsites.
In conclusion, high technology is the most prideful and effective using of it will result in wonderful experiences and benefits that can come along with us in social communities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is undoubtedly that state-of-the-art ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also brings us a variety of benefits. First of all, we will begin with the goo...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... avoid trivial conflicts or arguments. Second of all, the negative effects shou...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...due to the overuse of social ưebsites. In conclusion, high technology is the mo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, moreover, second, so, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 201.0 315.596192385 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63184079602 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17809605694 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.676616915423 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8536930993 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0769230769 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4615384615 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131095127068 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511957187242 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732307367809 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757896312822 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426534493929 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.