The best way to solve the environmental problems is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental protection is one of the most important challenges that we are facing. Some people state that the most effective way to tackle environmental issues is to rise the fuel cost. To some extent, I believe this solution could bring good results but definitely there are much better methods.
It is obvious that the growth of fuel price is an ieal solution for solving problems of the environment. As the cost of fuel is higher, people might use them more efficiently, more economized and the natural resources exploitation will also be minimized which reduce the problem of waste disposal. Moreover, citizens will take the public transportation like bus, train or ride bicycles instead of using their own private cars and motorbikes so that we could reduce quite a hugh amount of toxic emissions everyday.
However, there are superior ways to protect the environment that we should consider. The first solution is to plant more trees and flowers which will help to beautify the cityscape as well as improve the air quality. The second solution is have stricter punishment for people who have been accused for deteriorating the environment. For instance, they should be required to pay a huge fine or receive a prison sentence. Additionally, throw-away products like plastic bags, soda can ditrimentally impact our living surroundings so that we should end up using them and change to eco-friendly alternatives.
In conclusion, protecting environment is a challenge that needs the contribution of every individual, organization in the world as well as the combination of different solutions. We should deal with the pollution problems bit by bit, day by day so that we can reach the balance of the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...iently, more economized and the natural resources exploitation will also be minimized whi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 505, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... quite a hugh amount of toxic emissions everyday. However, there are superior ways to ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...the air quality. The second solution is have stricter punishment for people who have...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16845878136 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02852325133 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4731774749 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.923076923 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134825480717 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521917625265 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690152057808 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813291160721 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433898264507 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.