People aim to achieve the balance between their work and lives. But few people achieve it. What are the causes of the problems? How to overcome it?
Over the past few decades, we have seen an alarming increase in the number of people struggling with finding the balance between their work and lives. This essay will outline several possible causes for this tendency, and several potential measures to help address the matter.
It was Dalai Lama once said that we sacrificed our health in order to make wealth, and then sacrificed our health in order to get back our health. Indeed, in a materialistic and consumer-driven world, most of us hustle ourselves to work day and night so that we can cover the needs of our daily activities, which even somehow turns our nine to five jobs into nine to nine ones. To take Japan as an example, yet, Japanese citizens are arguably one of the most diligent and intelligent workers in the world; the majority of them, however, still have to work overtime owing the extreme high daily expenses, and therefore do not spend enough time on building personal life, such as getting married. As a result, we will soon suffer from exhaustion, nervousness and most signficantly imbalance in life.
Nevertheless, there are a variety of ways to create a healthy work-life balance. First of all, it is essential to prioritize between job and life flexibly. To illustrate, you might have a few days immersing in an array of works, but then truly shut work completely off for a while to pursue your own hobbies as well relax with your loved ones. Secondly, as you recognize your job gradually making you lethargic and lazy instead of empowering and exciting, it is time take changing workplace into account. Finally, regardless of how much you can earn from that job, health should always be the most profound concern, thus do not be afraid to call in sick. All in all, the importance of material wealth is likely to pale in comparison with human sanity.
In conclusion, I contend that the healthy work-life equipoise is a vital need in life, therefore steps need to be taken to achieve that.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, while, even so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62174827431 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614705882353 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.3421254149 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.538461538 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1538461538 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1538461538 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123798245512 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413570590923 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638280239092 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854522032414 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656151048894 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.