People can eat a wide variety of food that can be grown from other areas. As a results, people eat more food produced in other regions than local food. Do you think the advantage of this tend outweigh the disadvantage?
In recent year, these has been a growing trend toward buying imported food rather than food produced locally. However, whether or not this trend benefit people is certainly a contentious one. My view is that the advantage outweighs the disadvantage.
Since imported foods are always checked and only the best products end up on our market, those foods always have good quality. Indeed, if a supplier tries to sell low-quality products, it will sooner or later be rejected. Another guarantee that we eat good-quality food is the fact that the reputation of imported company is a stake. If they do not get good feedback from consumers, they will do everything to change the supplier and start offering the foods people will enjoy eating. By buying imported food in the long run, we can see that we can save money. When a certain food is imported in big quantities, it’s price even lower and it keeps both producers and buyers busy. Have( bear) in mind that even when food is being imported in big quantities, it’s quality is still checked.
It is also true that some local traditional food may receive bad influence due to the invasion of foreign food. Many traditional food makers are losing their market to giant food companies, and the traditional food making techniques are also fading eventually. But still, the cons are far greater.
In sum, food from oversea bring a lot of advantage such as good-quality food and reduced cost, which outweigh disadvantage. However, we should not neglect imported food’s negative effect regarding to business competition between foreign food and traditional food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...er than food produced locally. However, whether or not this trend benefit people is certainly ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 796, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es, it's quality is still checked. It is also true that some local traditio...
^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y. But still, the cons are far greater. In sum, food from oversea bring a lot of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, still, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08239700375 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68553168015 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610486891386 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8242395388 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4666666667 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338575860786 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114509073889 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536133040705 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212712628053 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211338890476 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.