People face for greater risks in our modern way of life when they did it in there past .How far do you agree or disagree?
It is undoubtedly true that the world has dramatically changed since a century ago and this inevitably has a considerable impact on our lifestyle. Our society has successfully dealt with many threats to humanity but nowadays we are facing new risks which were absent in the past.
In terms of health and illnesses, the improvement in healthcare has resulted in increasing the average human lifespan. However, the unhealthy diet and sedentary lifestyle the majority of people have, predispose them to developing a range of diseases. That is why, governments should consider what measures are needed to be taken against this global epidemic.
Another thing that have always presented a risk for people is crime. It is certain that today we are more protected from dangerous criminals because of the strict punishments which are received for committing an illegal action. Although newspapers and televisions are creating a perception of risk from violent attacks at public places, the statistics definitely show that the crime rate is decreasing.
Modern inventions like nuclear power stations could be regarded as life-threatening, tough a dangerous incident is extremely unlikely to occur. The chance of an airplane catastrophe is also commonly overestimated. In fact, the air transport is the second safest mean after railway transport. Moreover, people are afraid of natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods and even eruptions of volcanoes. They can undeniably cause a large part of world’s population to suffer and make a great damage to the infrastructure, but the actual risks which they pose are insignificant.
All in all, the substantial technological progress that we have made reduces the risks we face today. Although there are still some very serious perils, in my view they will be probably solved within the next century.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 487, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great damage'.
Suggestion: great damage
...ld's population to suffer and make a great damage to the infrastructure, but the actual r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, another thing, in fact, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38965517241 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05457493963 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675862068966 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6481136998 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.2 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162603413925 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431257048643 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410160618508 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754757096083 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318378016869 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.