People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the
reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world?
Today people know less and less about the significance of nature and this is a sad truth. This essay is to discuss causes for this and explore ways to help people learn more about mother nature. There are several reasons why people have limited understanding of the importance of the natural world. Firstly, today humans cluster in cities, away from the wilderness. Apart from the physical distance, the hectic pace of city life makes us reluctant to connect with nature. Secondly, the boom of digital media is also to blame. In the past, it was easier for a show about nature to gain viewership; today, the same content often struggles to attract viewers as audiences are lost in the abundance of choices. This explains why nature has become less popular. Following are some solutions to help people learn more about nature. To begin with, school curriculums should carry more contents about nature. More importantly, an innovative approach is needed; instead of textbook preaching, teachers should organise field trips into the wild where students can observe and learn first-hand. In addition, adventure tourism may encourage adults to explore more about nature. For many, the concept of tourism is reduced to the indulgence in hospitality services rather than adventure. The new approach enables them to embark on a more adventurous journey, hence, connect better with nature. In conclusion, nature is an integral part of human existence; therefore, people should better understand the importance of the natural world, to respect and protect it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, apart from, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59846108303 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5959399728 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6666666667 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35710785562 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112987427208 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122479902941 0.0667982634062 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.35710785562 0.151304729494 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.