People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world, what are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world ?
In this age of modern society, the environment is always at the forefront of the public; however, people are said not to have a thorough understanding of the significance of the natural world. From my perspective, this trend can be attributed to a number of factors, and in order to ameliorate its potential repercussions, some viable solutions can be implemented.
To begin with, the lack of natural knowledge is put down to two primary reasons. First of all, schools don’t fulfill their role in imparting enough information and knowledge in order to raise students’ awareness of the importance of the natural environment to our life. As a result, students, especially at a young age, gradually pay scant attention to environmental issues since they suppose that adults assume these responsibilities. In addition, people, nowadays, are living in the rat race, in which every individual has to make a concerted effort in order to thrive. Needless to say, residents are inclined to stay away from nature and move to cutting-edge metropolises, which may deprive them of opportunities to live in harmony with nature. All of these reasons give rise to the fact that the natural world is sinking to oblivion.
In the face of superficial knowledge about nature, two different pragmatic measures could be taken for the alleviation of this issue to be possible. First and foremost, schools should incorporate field trips with outdoor activities into the school curriculum, which will help to heighten students’ consciousness of the interdependence between human and nature. Besides, on a societal level, environmental campaigns can be initiated by authorities in every local area, as an incentive for people to protect the environment voluntarily.
In conclusion, the inadequate education system and hectic lifestyle account for the insufficiency of environmental understanding. However, educational support and environmental organization can help to reverse this undesirable trend.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, may, so, as to, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51633986928 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33828288175 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9997041409 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.846153846 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19551215622 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642556400239 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763604741889 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103052871242 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704689476817 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.