People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world, what are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world ?
In this age of modern society, the environment is always at the forefront of the public, however, people are said not to have a thorough understanding of the significance of the natural world. From my perspective, this trend can be attributed to a number of factors, and in order to ameliorate its potential repercussions, some viable solutions can be implemented.
To begin with, lack of natural knowledge is put down to 2 main direct and indirect reasons. First of all, schools don’t fulfill their role in imparting enough information and knowledge in order to help students to be aware of the importance of the natural environment to our life. As a result, students, especially at a young age, gradually pay scant attention to environmental issues since they suppose that these responsibilities belong to adults. In addition, people, nowadays, are living in the rat race, in which every individual has to complete their own business. Needless to say, residents are inclined to stay away from nature and move to cutting-edge metropolises, so that they might be deprived of the sense of living in harmony with nature. All of these reasons give rise to the fact that the natural world is sinking to oblivion.
In the face of having little knowledge about nature, two different pragmatic measures could be taken for the alleviation of this issue to be possible. First and foremost, schools should incorporate field trips with outdoor activities into the school curriculum, which will help to heighten their awareness of the interdependence between human and nature. Besides, in terms of society scale, environmental campaigns can be organized by authorities in every local area, as an incentive for people to protect the environment voluntarily.
In conclusion, school teaching and modern society account for the insufficiency of environmental understanding. However, educational support and environmental organization can help to reverse this undesirable trend.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, so, as to, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37096774194 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20387544983 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7798676446 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.076923077 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203182569413 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674289279389 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754755930503 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109899360864 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657936751789 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, so, as to, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37096774194 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20387544983 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7798676446 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.076923077 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203182569413 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674289279389 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754755930503 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109899360864 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657936751789 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.