he charts below give information about different types of waste diposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011
The provided pie charts illustrate how much garbage of different kinds was disposed of in a specific country in the year of 1960 and 2011
Overall, there was an upward trend in the amount of food, wood, plastic and metal waste, meanwhile the figures for glass and green waste prevailed consistency and paper, textiles and other types of waste witnessed a decrease. Also of particular note is that the most dramatic change was experienced in paper and plastic waste.
Paper waste made up the greatest percentage of total waste disposal, with 25% in 1960. This figure, then, substantially fell to 15% in 2011. Similar changes, but to a lesser extent, could be seen in the figures for textiles and other wastes, decreasing from 17% and 12% in 1960 to 11% and 4% in that turn in 2011. In addition, glass and green waste followed the same pattern, which remained stable at 5% and 9% respectively throughout the period.
Regarding the remaining types of waste, 12% and 8% food and plastic waste was disposed of in 1960, followed by a significant increase to 21% and 18% in that order, becoming the first and second greatest figures for waste disposal in 2011. Likewise, the percentage of wood and metal waste was 4% and 8% in 1960, with a subsequent rise to 8% and 9% respectively at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...er types of waste witnessed a decrease. Also of particular note is that the most dra...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, likewise, regarding, second, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72925764192 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58883839725 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53711790393 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.6401856844 43.030603864 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 135.375 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.625 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209243789184 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867460719042 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058789480034 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138574544453 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500506049725 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.