People living in large cities face several problems. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller towns?
Problems in urban areas have been attracting a great deal of public attention in recent decades. Although these issues could be pronounced, governments should not encourage the migration to smaller areas.
There are many problems when it comes to living in large cities. First, since industrial parks with manufacturing factories mostly concentrate in urban areas, the concentration of exhausted fumes is considerably high. This can make citizens more sensitive to respiratory diseases, especially tuberculosis, lung cancer, which will shorten their life expectancy. Second, the costs of living including accommodation, health care, transportation in metropolitan regions are prohibitively more expensive than those in smaller towns. It is implied that individuals with limited income cannot afford the high prices and eventually end up living in squalid conditions to save money.
Nonetheless, the migration to smaller towns could do more harm than good. First, citizens’ moving to smaller towns necessitates governments’ capital investment into installing public infrastructure as these areas are usually underfunded. This disbursement can account for the large percentage of national budget, thereby reducing funding for other social services. In addition, because the majority of workplaces locate in metropolitan areas, citizens in smaller towns have to rely on private vehicles to commute. This automobile dependency can come at the expenses of environmental costs, leading to the deterioration of already polluted atmosphere.
In conclusion, large cities could be fraught with problems such as polluted air and high living costs. However, for the interests of budget saving and environment, the migration of smaller towns should be discouraged by the official authorities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98062015504 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2467042175 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658914728682 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1438888723 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.214285714 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222406834696 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742432030466 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630066016854 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139399523084 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365621029908 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.