People no longer use newspapers and television because the internet plays the same role. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the advent of internet in 21st century, newspapers and televisions being replaced by its internet based version online news portal and live streaming TV channels respectively, therefore people no more use its traditional kind. I partially agree with this specifically for dwellers in urban or city areas, but there are still considerable number of people who prefer traditional newspapers and TVs.
On the one hand, online newspapers and TVs is attracting a growing number of people in urban or metropolitan areas for news and entertainment. There are three major factors behind this growing trend. One is its ease of accessibility and affordability of internet particularly in city suburbs or areas. For instance, there are lots of Internet Service Provider that provides numerous priced internet package targeting to customers with different level of income. In addition, it’s abundance out there over WWW with almost free of cost or charges such as New York Times, BBC, CNN etc. and these all provides up-to-date and dynamic news content, highly readable due to easy font change mechanism for all aged groups including far and short sighted people. Furthermore, for entertainment, live stream TV channel such as Disney Channel, HBO, 9x music etc. and social site like YouTube where anyone could indulge themselves with audio and video songs, movies, trailers, programs such as comedy shows, dramas etc.
On the other hand, there are locations particularly countryside or rural areas where internet is not available yet due to remoteness and lack of infrastructure. So, people living in those places are still unable to access internet consequently could not take the advantages what web offers. Deprive of net usages, for them, traditional TVs and paper based static news content is the only source for amusement and world’s news. Admittedly, if internet becomes available in those remote corners, most of them would be incapable to proper use internet either due to lack of education or poverty. It is especially true in the case of developing and underdeveloped nations, for example nations in Asia, Africa and Middle East.
In conclusion, I would consider it is utterly disregarding to the fact that significant number of people still using traditional newspapers and TVs even though online based portals and TVs gaining popularity to a vast section of people in towns or cities around the globe.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun Internet seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of Internets'.
Suggestion: lots of Internets
...burbs or areas. For instance, there are lots of Internet Service Provider that provides numerous...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 807, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (TV) must be used with a third-person verb: 'channels'.
Suggestion: channels
...more, for entertainment, live stream TV channel such as Disney Channel, HBO, 9x music e...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 10.4138276553 259% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30909090909 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8795578829 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602597402597 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.2831780272 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.266666667 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9333333333 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150783978899 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045852253389 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529799976785 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105489358398 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521609094015 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.