People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other
vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
It is true that many people prefer to the government should go up the price of fuel for personal transport in order to decrease bad affectation to environment. Personally, I absolutely agree with this point.
One reason is that the number of individual cars could be declined if the fuel cost is gone up, which stands a good chance of protecting environment. Reducing the number of cars would limit a large amount of emissions and more people would use public transports. As an illustration, China which the most air pollutant is the emission of cars and motorbikes.
Another reason is money saved could be used to improve public transport. For instance, extending the system of bus and train could encourage more residents travel by public transport. Only by do people regularly use bus and train, the use of car would be reduced and the air quality could be improved. This could be visible referred to as the most relevant example of this argument is in dense population countries such as China and India, traffic jam usually happen and product a large amount of emission. Therefore, the problem about air pollution could be solved when dwellers use bus or train instead of personal transport.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that increasing the taxes on petro is good for environment and should be early enforced.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
- The chart graph below shows the information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 230.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9347826087 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73996191659 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573913043478 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2143291641 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.181818182 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176711315977 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660831608931 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623867401472 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121725244966 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441151801722 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.