People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion.
It is sometimes argued that authorities should raise the price of petrol to address environmental issues. Although this could be true to a certain extent, I tend to believe that there are better ways to combat these problems.
Admittedly, there are several benefits associated with increasing the cost of fuel. Firstly, the number of private cars and motorbikes are likely to reduce in a way that best suits for expensive cost, which means exhaust fumes from vehicles will be cut down. In fact, people prefer to take public transport rather than drive, which lead the governments put more resources into public transport provision. Secondly, in terms of freight services, more goods would have to transported by rail rather than truck. This measure would limit the carbon dioxide emissions and contribute to reduce the greenhouse effect.
However, in my view, goverments could adopt many policies which could be more effective in the long term. From an educational perspective, the authorities should launch environmental campaigns to raise public awareness. For instance, this is extremely important particularly when these campaigns are implemented in educational institution, which means children will study to be more kinder to environment in a young age and end up protecting enviroment in later in life. More improtantly, political leaders should introduce laws to encourage public transport. To illustrate, this is highly beneficial for those who have to travel long distance from home and workplace, and avoid traffic jam on rush hour.
In conclusion, while raising in fuel cost might be a useful stopgap measure, I believe that the goverments have an even greater solution to tackle environmental problems. It is thus hoped that improving the efficiency of public transport and raising awareness of evironmental protecting are better alternative outcomes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'kinder' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: kinder
..., which means children will study to be more kinder to environment in a young age and end u...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44137931034 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92944378743 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613793103448 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9518002284 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139562429043 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472637782057 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473400005357 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0783832904603 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316521793939 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.