People who have original ideas are of greater value to the society than people who are simply able to copy the ideas of others well. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement.
There is considerable concern about whether the individuals who have extraordinary ideas can make a greater contribution to the development of society or imitators of the ideas. I believe that the people who have new ideas play essential role in the society compared to their followers.
On the one hand, the community might witness the greatest advanced by assistance of people who hold unique notions. Since these kinds of people may lead other members of the society to convenient and easy life style using their ideas. For example, I would thanks to the inventors of modern technologies such as computer, mobile phone and others. Admittedly, our life has totally changed through these devices. Furthermore, the people demonstrate crucial role to make a decision in extreme situations. The problems may solve wisely by using their advice.
On the other hand, the people who copy of others’ ideas might service to spread these ideas to whole the world. As a result of this, all people may have access to use these ideas in certain conditions. For instance, although mobile phones which are one of the most important inventions in our society were invented in the west, now it is widespread to the world by helping imitators.
Taking everything into consideration, the community need the both individuals who have original ideas and imitate the notions. However, I support the view that the owners of rare views are most significant in order to provide the society with better and comfort life rather than user of the ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'thank'
Suggestion: thank
...using their ideas. For example, I would thanks to the inventors of modern technologies...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07114624506 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73580038153 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573122529644 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.603737134 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6923076923 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330409610306 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110622779298 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957319202909 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20406049857 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703247616192 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.