The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of the company. What can comapnies do to increase staff pruduction?
The staff is very important for the any company beacuse without staff no single company run. For instance, the given topic asserts that what are the impact of staff on company, and how comapnies increase staff pruduction? I shall explore this all concepts through the various dimensions in following paragraphs.
There are two main impact of the staff on company. The first and foremost is the staff do not understand the work of company. As well as, they are unable to do work effectively of the company. It is very big issue for the company. Because the staff play vital role in the company without the employees the work is not properly done. The good illustration here is the company should provide the training to the staff of free of cost with the help of specialists. They are not care about the cost because with the help of tarining the the production of comapnies are increased.
The second key point is state that the staff have been happy to perform in the company on the other hand, the staff are satisfied from the working conditions of the company. If the staff satisfied they do work efficiently and increased the production of the company. It is also possible when the company motivated to all staff and also give equality to all employees of company. Not any type of partiality in the staff members. As a result the company do there best in production n. The best suitable solution is here to give rewards, incentive, and other benefits to the staff members of the company for increasing their production effectively.
In conclusion there are varity of different factors that have led to make this problem worse, while it not may be possible to find a complete solution of this could probably be solved by the understanding of both the staff as well as company. They thibk about each other. The staff perform well for the comoany and the company provide benefits to the employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
.... It is very big issue for the company. Because the staff play vital role in the compan...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... cost because with the help of tarining the the production of comapnies are increased. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... cost because with the help of tarining the the production of comapnies are increased. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ype of partiality in the staff members. As a result the company do there best in p...
^^
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... by the understanding of both the staff as well as company. They thibk about each other. T...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74698795181 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56143841593 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442771084337 0.561755894193 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2183961065 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9473684211 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4736842105 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351265135575 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125799841098 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998901950766 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228493761379 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596639285571 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.