A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honor, kindness and trust, no longer see, important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.
It is now commonly believed that traditional values are of less important in a person’s worth as others consider more on their popularity and wealth possessions. In my opinion, I agree that social status as well as material possessions are only influential, however, I strongly believe that old-fashioned values are still the key to one’s great reputation.
On the one hand, there are reasons as to why a certain personality is influential. Firstly, he can be a celebrity who can act, who can sing, and who can dance. As a result, he is popular that instantly his social status is highlighted by his followers. Secondly, if you are politician, then you are rich. In my country if you are a politician then you are powerful. Politicians have to initiative to build projects and livelihoods that in the eyes of the people they are kind. Without knowing by many that the money is the money of the people.
On the other hand, there’s no other way that a good personality of having the traditional values such as honor, kindness and trust will be seen as positive to others. One’s worth or good reputation is built by someone by possessing these traits. Good friendship as well as strong partnership is formed because of these values. Ultimately, love and respect will find their ways among the people if traditional values are given a more importance.
In conclusion, I believe that having the influence of being a popular should not be the basis of one’s worth, but instead it should be the true inside values that they have.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9053030303 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94857350999 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2495005912 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214397610329 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643738757344 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541287744622 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123294476719 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040597190255 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.