It is believed that people are judged by their social status and physical possessions these days and traditional values are not a part of important aspects anymore. This essay will discuss why invisible values are essential in this era as well.
To begin with, social class is a very typical and simple way to identify people's rank in society. Those values are not entirely wrong as people in high social class are success in each field or industry. However, According to research from a Japanese company, people with a high income are more likely to have a poor personality, especially when they take over worthful possessions from their parents. Those people have a less sense of empathy with others because they usually dose not experience a tough time in their lives.
On the other hand, it is obvious that old-fashioned values are important to know a person's worth. For example, a lot of people are willing to find a life partner who has a great personality. This can include kindness, honesty, and humbleness. This is because people see a person's values in total not only their fame or what job they have. If social status and material possessions are the most valuable resources to sort out a person, people never focus on personality. In addition, it cannot be bought by money even though people are desperate with a good personality. This is created throughout all experiences they had in their lives and the process makes people more mature and interesting as a human being.
In conclusion, old-fashioned values such as personality are essential to gain a person's worth even if social status and material possessions affect their values to a certain point.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in their lives. On the other hand, it is obvious that old-fashioned values ...
^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...affect their values to a certain point.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95035460993 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70094536783 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1744528373 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174094666919 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662707347232 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500764554097 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123640614466 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510603804054 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.