Some people feel that social status and material possions are the best parameters to judge the people's value. People who have luxurious cars, expensive outifits, big houses, high profile at work or in society, are more worthy than the people who are kind, trustworthy and honest. I believe this trend is going up and though it is not the right way to judge the people.
Firstly, in today's world, people are having more stress and long working hours compared to the pervious generation. Everybody wants to be rich and live luxurious life because this give them a high status in society and respect from people. People believe what they see and that makes the show off trend more in demand. For example, if a person drives an expensive car on the road and pass by you while you are walking on the footpath, by seeing him, it definitely gives his rich impression. Same as by seeing big villas or houses, it obviously convince us to think that people living in these houses are more valuable.
Secondly, people who are in high profile also makes us to believe that they are more important. Their outfits, their job status, their public appearance also shadow their worthiness. For example, CEO of a company will have more respect compare to the experienced manager of the same organisation. People attracts by the social status of the person.
It is sad to see that we are setting up the incorrect parameters for judgement which will lead us to die our traditional morals and values. It is not true that rich, royal, socially famous faces are always good at heart.However, there are example we have seen that wealthier people with arrogant and egostic in their behaviour.They do not care others as they are self centered. We are forgetting that we are human and human is social animal. society is nothing but groups of people and families emotionally living together though as individual's in practical. In family, first and foremost important responsibilities of a family member is, be kind, be trustworthy, helpful and affection for each other. These values will help to build a society in true sense.
In summary, it is true that nowadays, people's worth is measured by their social status and material possession. People are actually worthy by their values and by their assets. We are putting incorrect parameters for the judgement and we should correct it before our traditional values dies on which society has been built.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'convinces'?
Suggestion: convinces
...eing big villas or houses, it obviously convince us to think that people living in these...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y the social status of the person. It is sad to see that we are setting up ...
^^^
Line 9, column 221, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...y famous faces are always good at heart.However, there are example we have seen that we...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 328, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...arrogant and egostic in their behaviour.They do not care others as they are self cen...
^^^^
Line 9, column 443, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Society
...e are human and human is social animal. society is nothing but groups of people and fam...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in summary, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 13.1623246493 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 24.0651302605 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2026.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90556900726 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59659463551 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513317191283 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5218817954 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4761904762 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114236802172 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039040459168 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418664057101 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0672341654881 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127588587986 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.