A person's worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
These days, people are being identified by their money who is very rich. While, other argue that there is no value for the people whom follows traditional values, kind hearted ones. This essay will argue why big corporate heads are given too much respect.
Firstly, individual who do not have strong economic background are being discriminated. Despite that they still plays a vital role in the society because these people would always prioritize others problems than theirs. Next is the trust issues, it is very rare to find a person who trusts others without even thinking the consequences that they are going to face in the future. For example, during my 10th grade, I helped an elderly people whom were crossing the road near the signal so that I reached out to that man and helped him to cross the road carefully. Even though, he saw me as a stranger with no trust but after crossing the road, it totally changed his thought and started trusting me. Therefore, kind people should be treated equally in the face of society.
Meanwhile I agree that kindhearted people needs to be given same status as the richer ones. However, luxurious pupil has the most of the people and far more superior than the follower of traditional ones. It is very easy for a billionaire to buy out a person with just giving them huge sum of money. Rich persons are the one who controls the government due to the exchange of currency between politicians who is currently in the power. For instance, in India most of the leaders had been bought for certain value, where they no longer have the power to make decisions of a country. The power has been changed from nation’s leaders to the hands of corporate leader. By recording above instance, richest ones are being recognized by their rich status.
To sum up, richer people are recognizable than the ones who support the ancient values. In my opinion, I totally agree with the above statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'play'
Suggestion: play
... discriminated. Despite that they still plays a vital role in the society because the...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...ated equally in the face of society. Meanwhile I agree that kindhearted people needs t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[2]
Message: The adjective more is normally used with to and does not need 'more' (so called implicit comparative). Probably you need to write: 'superior to'.
Suggestion: superior to
...upil has the most of the people and far more superior than the follower of traditional ones. It is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 699, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the richest'.
Suggestion: , the richest
...rate leader. By recording above instance, richest ones are being recognized by their rich...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79166666667 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46218567063 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6136362688 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4444444444 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129996578191 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431103123373 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0320842599669 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0820294462728 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00607669721437 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.