Planting trees is very important for the environment. Some people say trees should be planted in the vacant areas of cities and towns, while other says housing facilities should be built instead.
Do you agree or disagee?
It is undeniable that trees play an important role in protecting our environment. Therefore, despite many arguments over having more housing constructions in urban areas, I believe that governments should consider planting more trees as the priority.
Many scientists have warned us that if we want to enhance our living environment, we should increase the number of trees in our surroundings. Firstly, trees reduce temperatures by shade and transpiring water. Thus, this can help to decrease energy costs for cooling cities which are often hotter than the countryside due to their buildings and the machinery. Studies have even proven that the cooling effect of one mature tree is equal to that of 10 room-sized air conditioners.
Secondly, trees are the most effective method to improve air quality for their ability of producing oxigen. Air pollution in cities is a serious environmental problem, especially in developing countries. In an attempt to cut down emissions from motor traffic, governments have tried countless ways such as banning cars in certain parts of the city in specific hours or encouraging people to use public transport. However, planting more trees appears to be more effortless, eco-friendly and have a longer-term impact on the environment.
Other people would argue that as overpopulation is becoming more problematic for governors in urban planning, building more housing facilities to adapt the necessities of the population are more vital than growing more trees. Nonetheless, I maintain my belief that urban development and environmental protection can go hand in hand. For instance, Singapore is well-known for its green environment with 29,3% of trees in the city. Instead of narrowing their parks to have more space for construction, they plant more trees on top and in every corner of the buildings so that they can continue to maintain green life in the city.
In conclusion, I firmly think that urbanisation and modernisation do not mean to cut down trees to save space for buildings and houses. In fact, planting more trees is a sustainable and long-lasting method to protect our living environment and prolong our well-being.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-27 | tammynguyen | 78 | view |
- Some people have benefited from modern technology, but some have not benefited from it at all. To what extent do you agree? 89
- Children who start reading earlier in life, perform better later on in their school studies.How important are early reading skills in a child´s academic performance?What are preschool factors influence a child´s later academic achievements? 84
- Some people think that public health is a responsibility of the government while others think that people should be responsible for their own health.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
- Globalisation has both advantages and disadvantages Discuss both views and give your opinion 75
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30813953488 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06996013313 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3323738931 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.125 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242735384908 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797777375852 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369816952687 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141000703483 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256487747586 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.