At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, adolescence has widely populated in several nations in comparison with the elderly, and this brings merits in order to increase country’s productivity and innovate industries. However, demerits cannot outbalance the aforementioned advantages.
It is believed that the existence of young adults has an ability to create a nation to be productive due to contributing on revenues. Although older people’s experiences are needed in businesses, this problem will be tackled if the country cooperates with companies to launch a program for the youth so that it results to have productive experts with fully developed skills. For instance, Indonesia government in 2020 launched an online workshop about informatic skills collaborating with coding startups for only 19-year-old information technology employees to solve lack of senior employer issues. Therefore, the authority experiences an increase of national GDP from 5% to 10%, being one of the most productive country in Asia in 2021.
Furthermore, another advantage of a state having higher youngster population than the elderly is a fresh idea for industries. Yet, the thought of older persons is bright to advance firms. Nevertheless, the adolescences are more creative because they have situated to cope with globalization era, which senior workers may not recognize about today trends. For example, in technology industry, Apple hires a number of young workers to promote its products because these cohorts are able to create advertisement videos creatively with attractive content based on market alternation to attract buyers, and when this task is offered to over-50-year-old employers, the promotion will be boring since they possess a tendency to make old-fashioned style promotion.
In conclusion, it is true that larger young than elder citizens can change a state to be more productive and alter industry to be innovative, and these benefits can exceed the disadvantages. Where possible, elderly role is required as tutors for the youth workers instead of retiring them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57692307692 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10664067846 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637820512821 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.5417345277 49.4020404114 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.0 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144952576703 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478412979243 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376238913142 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798074349347 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374619938819 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.