Indubitably, the traditional way to solving crimes is putting prisoners behind the bars. It is often argued that there is the best solution to solve these problems via giving the best education instead of practicing traditional ways of punishing people. However, I firmly concur with this notion as education could not be the only way to solve such crimes.
There are several reasons to agree that there others ways to solve crimes instead of putting prisoners in jail. First and foremost, education contributes enormously to raising two factors that are awareness and intelligence among individuals. These factors make society more civilized. For instance, when a person can access better educational services, they would be well-informed about damages and dangers that crimes cause for their community and themselves. Additionally, if citizens have access to the same fundamental education with certain qualifications, they can secure their standard of living and dispel all crimes.
On the other hand, there are certain reasons why prisons play an essential role in social security. Firstly, criminals who committed serious crimes must be imprisonment for their horrifying actions such as murderers, rapists, and drug trafficking. They can get some education but still must be kept away from the community. Another reason is people know committing such dreadful crimes makes life miserable. They will lose their freedom and would go down the path.
In conclusion, it is groundless to say that education is a more effective solution as each criminal addresses the problem in different ways. Both are equally significant and complement each other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 616, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...standard of living and dispel all crimes On the other hand there are certain reas...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their freedom and would go down the path In conclusion it is groundless to say th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3671875 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72841985448 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6171875 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 256.0 20.2975951904 1261% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1374.0 106.682146367 1288% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 256.0 20.7667163134 1233% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 106.0 7.06120827912 1501% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283076683466 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.283076683466 0.084324248473 336% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174403574757 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077543728633 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 131.9 13.0946893788 1007% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -196.82 50.2224549098 -392% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 104.3 11.3001002004 923% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.35 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 20.78 8.58950901804 242% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 63.0 9.78957915832 644% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 104.4 10.1190380762 1032% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 63.0 10.7795591182 584% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.