Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high-tech media such as software, videos or DVDs.
When it comes to public libraries, books are the first things that appear in our minds and many people believe that limited resources and space should not be wasted on providing hi-tech media. However, from my perspective, in an information age, it is crucial to change the traditional way of getting information.
On the one hand, providing hi-tech media in public libraries brings us so many benefits. The first point to note is that it brings multiple accesses. For instance, there is usually only one book but many people want to read it. With the help of e-books, the problem is unfolded easily. This solution also works with videos or DVDs. In addition, using videos is a more effective way to gain information or knowledge. We can really watch how it is happening, not just imagine from emotionless words. Moreover, spending times looking for the book you want and then carry them is not really a good choice. By contrast, all you have to do is sit at a computer, put your DVDs in or choose which book to read.
Nevertheless, there are still some disadvantages of information technology. First is physical problems. Reading books or watching videos on hi-tech devices requires a large amount of time and this may weaken our eyes’ sights. Also, there are questionable contents which may be unfiltered yet.
In conclusion, I believe that with hi-tech media in public libraries, obtaining information will be much easier. The important thing is we all have to learn to take advantage of IT correctly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, still, then, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94140625 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75830765296 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61328125 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9699519035 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0625 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237925422082 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589480508957 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839295729788 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134415122037 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654320727818 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.