The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinions
It is argued that these days a number of technological devices available are rising the conflict between the wealthy people and the poverty people. While some people think that it has an opposite impact, I would argue both aspects and believe that the advantages are more dramatic
On the one hand, there are several reasons why this issue causes an increase in the gap between the two classes of society. First and foremost, the increasing level of automation may lead to a higher unemployment rate. Driverless cars, for instance, are gradually replacing the human in the driver area, particularly, taxi drivers, truck drivers, and so on which means low-income people may earn less money than the past. As a result, they could struggle to fend for themselves and also support their families. Secondly, just the rich may equip themselves with modern facilities such as air conditioning systems or smart items, which may improve their productivity, while the weak people could not afford to do this.
On the other hand, I would argue that why this phenomenon could decrease the conflict between the poor and the rich. First of all, more and more having modern technology would generate new kinds of jobs for all people regardless of their financial backgrounds, which means people from all financial platforms could have a better job opportunity. A ride-share driver, a typical example of this, is more prevalent over the world. Furthermore, due to the development of the internet, people from all backgrounds may approach to a wealth of information. As a result, poor people may acquire an adequate amount of knowledge which helps them earn money in the future.
In conclusion, although having negative influences because of the improvement of gadgets, especially, the distance of two classes of society, there are also a couple of benefits that falling that gap significantly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12703583062 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79101208029 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579804560261 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3609486297 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.166666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1666666667 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197911767662 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677791300073 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649868344002 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115300601355 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684827729308 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.