Reading is more educational than watching videos or TV.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Spending time in front of the TV and watching videos is considered less effective than reading books in gaining knowledge. I partially agree with the above statement because it depends on the individual's skill.
A person with better imaginary skills can manage to visualize and understand the theoretical knowledge gained from reading books, journals, articles, newspapers. Moreover, any topic of science, geography, politics require a person's effort to imagine the situation and understand it. To illustrate, If a person read about " what is an earthquake? ", an individual must think about it and try to visualize and imagine an earthquake practically. for example, books do have the theory of photosynthesis, that must be imagined by the individual about the real-life process of photosynthesis. Although most books contain images, a person must apply his imaginary skills.
On the other hand, A person with limited imaginary skills may not be able to get the desired knowledge only by reading books. Whereas videos contain better graphics, consequently, watching videos and television allows a person to accelerate his imagination and gain more knowledge. For instance, the reading theory could give limited knowledge than watching a video with a better explanation could give greater knowledge.
To conclude, acquiring more knowledge is based on the imaginary skills of a person. A person with good visualisation skills could understand a book more efficiently and gain more education. In contrast, a person with little imaginary skills can use videos more efficiently and get more education. Hence, reading and watching videos are equally effective depending upon the person's skill.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ove statement because it depends on the individuals skill. A person with better imagin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... science, geography, politics require a persons effort to imagine the situation and und...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... and imagine an earthquake practically. for example, books do have the theory of ph...
^^^
Line 13, column 374, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...re equally effective depending upon the persons skill.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, may, moreover, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56704980843 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99760379536 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528735632184 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9033251702 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.8666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195552534621 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756735576742 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630769167939 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140353984671 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056365309125 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.