Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that rich people should use their money to lend a helping hand to the less fortunate. Although this view is so good, I believe that it is absolutely not their responsibility.
To begin with, I will cite a great quote from Jack Ma is " the wealth is not how much money you own, but how much you can help the society". Therefore, a person becomes wealthy, they can create benefits for society. They can help poor residents approaching to essential needs such as clean water, foods, education and health care. Take the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as an example, it is the largest private charity in the world, with the aim of improving health care and reducing global poverty. In addition, billionaires can spend their finance to reduce the burden for their authority. For example, during Covid-19 pandemic, the " technology giants" have sponsored money and medical equipment for government American to control disease situation in the country.
On the other hand, despite the undeniable positive social impacts created by helping people and invest in philanthropy. In order to become the upper-class in society, most people have to overcome countless difficulties and try very hard to gain their wealth. Hence, it is reasonable that such individuals would want to enjoy their life to make up for those tiring days of hard work. For example, wealthy people can do numerous things such as travelling around the world, eating in luxurious restaurants, or even purchasing jewellery or houses. Such activities can be seen as proof to prove that their hard work does pay off.
In conclusion, I think that the most important thing about being rich is that it enables people to experience more things in life. Although supporting others is socially beneficial, it should be optional.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08361204013 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76151327275 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632107023411 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6080273283 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226440702041 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758008191624 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993527931726 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165675853882 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119774175086 0.056905535591 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.