In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
it is undeniable that family is always indispensible part for every people. Nevertheless, in recent years, due to development of society and appearance of numerous economic issues, family structure has become virtually different from the last decades. And this can exert significant influences for daily life of individuals.
Probably, the most radical change is the shifting of extended families towards nuclear households. Increasing of house prices and population density are two primary factors contributing to this tendency. In a society where many people find it more difficult in earning a living and taking care of their children, living in a small group is virtually the only way to reduce the burden of financial difficulty. As a result, families with working mother and single-parent households has become more ubiquitous, especially in city centers. Furthermore, most households nowadays are dual-income, parents are usually away from home and spend less time with children, leading to the lack of monitoring during their formative years. Facing with this phenomenon, parents are likely to opt for child-minding or afterschool childcare modules, rather than spending less time at work to stay with their children.
Consequently, these changes have exerted significant influences in modern families. In terms of children upbringing, family gathering is paramount importance in shaping children’s personal traits and avoid risks of children suffering from social problems. In other words, the less time parents spending with their children, the less opportunities they can absorb conventions and codes of conduct, which may follow them and hopefully lead to successful career. Moreover, being alone at home for a long time without supervision makes children become victimized by bullying, truancy, delinquency. Secondly, disappearance of ties of kinship also brings sense of alienation, especially for those living far away from relatives.
In conclusion, it seems that shifting towards nuclear family structures and lacking of role models for children are main changes of role of families compared to the past. This can become substantial drawback for daily life of many people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is undeniable that family is always ind...
^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he shifting of extended families towards nuclear households. Increasing of house ...
^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun opportunities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rents spending with their children, the less opportunities they can absorb conventio...
^^^^
Line 5, column 637, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...condly, disappearance of ties of kinship also brings sense of alienation, especia...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6696969697 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0063737007 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60303030303 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9340877588 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.9375 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148729277209 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567907350464 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833728643864 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113468399419 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624066294412 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.