In recent years, many governments have brought in laws to ban smoking in public places, such as bars, restaurants and offices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with banning smoking in public places?
Today, smoking is strictly prohibited at many public places. This ban has been placed through legislation by several governments. I am convinced that this measure is in line with the need of public health safety and customer experience.
One of the main justifications of this ban is the health safety of non-smokers from effects of second-hand smoke. It is clinically proven that smoking has adverse effects on body including lung cancer. If smokers are allowed to smoke at workplaces, for example, it would put their non-smoking peers at the risk of developing chronic diseases. According to a research, those who are exposed to passive smoking are equally liable to the smoking side-effects such as coughs, colds and asthma and in some cases, increased cancer risks by 10 to 19%. Thus, banning smoking is healthy is necessary to promote healthy and safe environment to non-smokers.
Another reason to prohibit smoking at public places like bars and restaurants is increased air quality. Bars and restaurants are crucial establishments attracting millions of the users every year. If smoking is allowed inside these places, it would result in an enormous amounts of pollution released in the air. A 2015 study showed New Jersey bars and restaurants resulted in more than nine times the level of air pollution than its neighboring cities with minimum number of these establishments. Therefore, the ban an imperative step to prevent cities getting more polluted.
In conclusion, government’s intervention to ban smoking in public places is justifiable as it not only ensure people’s health safety, but also works as tool to deal with increasing air pollution in the cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'amount'?
Suggestion: amount
... places, it would result in an enormous amounts of pollution released in the air. A 201...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2936802974 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04874419125 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613382899628 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5897112015 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.714285714 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304123667278 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104507752604 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571399070545 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187367068316 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032824174269 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.