In recent years many governments have brought in laws to ban smoking in public places such as bars restaurants and offices To what extent do you agree or disagree with banning smoking in public places

It is irrefutable that these days smoking in public places has proliferated. However, many governments prohibited to smoke in the places which are free to all. I firmly agree with this statement, ban of smoking in public places can avoid several issues.

Firstly, smoking is hazardous to the health, it leads to several troubles such as cough, fewer and lung cancer. In addition, smoking in the common areas can have the adverse effects to the non-smokers as well. For instance, it is clinically proven that almost 30% of citizens who do not smoke suffer heart disease only because of inhaling the toxic air of the cigarette.

Secondly, puffing in public places mainly restaurants, bars and offices has to be strictly prohibited because plethora of families with kids visit to the restaurants and therefore, the air might be harmful for the young generation. Moreover, smoking plays the major role in order to make the air more detrimental. Nevertheless, government authority are now strict regarding smoking in public areas and also they have brought in some rules and regulations for the smokers in order to avoid such issues. For example, administration of South Korea has put 90% ban on selling of cigarettes and also they raised the price of such cigarettes to decline the number of smokers.

To conclude, although, currently there are many smokers smokes in public places but governments are trying their best to prevent the air and their effects too.Such prohibition can be beneficial for the environment as well.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Such
...o prevent the air and their effects too.Such prohibition can be beneficial for the e...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7818727505 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6645798919 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.363636364 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.2727272727 7.06120827912 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388870560768 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14843632908 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828873126277 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239574445374 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108892355946 0.056905535591 191% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.