Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience.
It is true that more and more buildings are becoming old and government should restore those, which involves enormous government expenditure while they can spend this money constructing new houses and roads instead, which is useful than re-build. Personally, I partly agree with this opinion, and this essay will provide suitable reasons with explanations and examples.
First of all, there are a lot of benefits of re-build old construction and the advantage is that it takes less time and raw materials such as metal, woods, and so on to build since governments just need to add more of them to repair instead of preparing full materials to build brand new buildings. For example, to build a new bridge, governments must spend a huge amount of money to hire workers and materials to build it, while re-building spend less money than but the quality still unchage. Secondly, some unique buildings like churches, temples, houses with mark historical events, and so on can not demolish and build brand new one since these buildings have many meaningful factors in that place.
On the other hand, governments still need to consider building new houses and roads than relying on repair most of the time. This is because in some cases, these old buildings can not repair anymore and the best solution is to destroy them and create new houses. For instance, in cities, there are numerous apartments that are extremely old with musty all over the wall and pipes are drolling wasted water all the time, in this problem governments need to require citizens to move out of this area for a time to create new apartments for them, which helps them feel less worried on the threat of the buildings will collapse and improves their living conditions.
In conclusion, I believe that governments need to wisely on choosing these two methods, which not only reduce the cost of construction but also restore lots of buildings, which consist of historical factors.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in some cases, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96330275229 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57784561113 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529051987768 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.896014826 49.4020404114 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.333333333 106.682146367 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.3333333333 20.7667163134 175% => OK
Discourse Markers: 18.1111111111 7.06120827912 256% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331251883183 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151887936798 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850569447889 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199989134828 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108663267157 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.