Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience.
In this contemporary era, there is an inclination in old values preservation, especially in protecting and refurbishing buildings. In the same line with this, people polarise whether the government should channel resources into this area or new houses and roads constrcution. This essay will throw some light on both notions of the concept and give a personal conclusion.
To commence with, there are some justifications for those who criticize restoration. They can conceive of old buildings as being fragile. Their structures might be too dangerous for citizens to live or work in. The government's effort in these places' expenditure could be considered as squandering a colossal amount of money. Instead, the administration should focus on upgrading national infrastructure, including houses and roads to fulfill their residents' welfare. For instance, 20 years ago, Danang authorities transformed the Han riverside with many old-fashioned and delicate houses is to walk promenade areas for people to enjoy an assortment of outdoor pursuits. This is a robust evidence of the investment in our lives' development.
In a stark contrast, we should not underrate the role of old buildings' renovation. These sites could reserve historical values and constitute a crucial part of a country's culture. The country which focuses on the restoration of these invaluable features could attract publicity, especially historic lovers. Many experts prove this as a stimulus of the tourism industry, which can foster the economy and provide a thousand stable jobs for citizens. Hoi An Old Town is a precise example. The government has spared no effort and expense to protect and preserve its old constructions, not only to attract tourists but also to preserve the indigenous culture.
To recapitulate, I must pen down that depending on the condition and value of each building, a different viewpoint can be put into consideration. In the end, it is the government that makes a wise decision based on each situation and their residents' demands.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...us for citizens to live or work in. The governments effort in these places expenditure coul...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'places'' or 'place's'?
Suggestion: places'; place's
...ork in. The governments effort in these places expenditure could be considered as squa...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...we should not underrate the role of old buildings renovation. These sites could reserve h...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, as for, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38871473354 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15566719939 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623824451411 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0923380561 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7222222222 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 7.06120827912 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205728706924 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575484543309 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039018342344 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10939155102 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562370433269 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.