Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems. What are the problems? What could be done to solve those problems?
In these recent years, one distinctly realizes that there is no separate street for cycles and cars, which probably cause many consequences. This essay will elaborate further on some negative aspects of this pattern happening worldwide, also their solutions.
On the first side, traffic jam is what many nations have to face due to the fact that there are not different lands for cars and cycles. Especially in the current situation, vehicles have exceeded available roads in some urban areas. If there is not any proper solution, the condition would be worse in the near future. The government is assumed to be responsible for solving this by enhancing the infrastructure of the landscape. Particularly, in Vietnam, there are some extra bridges which were built for the purpose of having more spaces for cyclers.
On the other hand, the more means of transportation on the street in various kinds, the more accidents are likely to occur. It is even more difficult for trunk drivers to notice the smaller bikes or bicycles which are in front of them. Furthermore, some of the traffic participants are not very cautious. As a result, there have been lots of unfortunate cases in Vietnam that are recorded annually. In terms of efficient methods for this issue, it is not only the governmental organs who should be in charge but also individuals. For instance, more strict rules should be applied, as well as all the people who attend the traffic must gain their awareness.
In conclusion, the statement that cyclists and car drivers sharing the same roads definitely cause at least 2 serious problems which are traffic accidents and traffic congestion. To solve them, we need both the government and society's contributions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...hich are in front of them. Furthermore, some of the traffic participants are not very cauti...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...here have been lots of unfortunate cases in Vietnam that are recorded annually. I...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, well, at least, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07719298246 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77055262257 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60350877193 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6296137424 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.4666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177664356416 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499850758201 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651779719169 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111312488857 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909906058934 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.