Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems. What are the problems? What could be done to solve those problems?
In many regions, it is very common to see bicycles and cars traverse in the same lane. This essay shall discuss the detrimental effects of bicycle driving and the possible solutions to ameliorating these impacts.
There are several issues associated with vehicular cycling. If cyclists and drivers travel on a shared road, they run a higher risk of being involved in fatal accidents due to the vehicles’ different sizes and speeds. In case of accidental collision, much larger and faster cars may cause grave injuries to bicyclists. Moreover, it is more difficult to maintain a smooth flow of traffic because drivers need to wait and give way to bikers, hence an increased possibility of traffic congestion and consequential road rage.
Certain measures can be employed to avoid the aforementioned problems. Roads with separate lanes should be built so that cars and bikes can run at their own speed and avoid interfering with each other’s traffic flow. Where lane division is not possible, it may help to enable bikes to join cars on a road only within a certain time frame, i.e. off-peak hours. Most importantly, traffic participants should be trained to perform safe driving in shared spaces. By doing this, they may be more self-assured when they engage in complex traffic situations.
In conclusion, vehicular cycling may increase the likelihood of fatal accidents and traffic jams. To mitigate these consequences, the government may consider constructing segregated lanes, imposing time restrictions and equipping citizens with sufficient knowledge about road safety
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, moreover, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36947791165 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88765353301 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.66265060241 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2018255866 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.846153846 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124570099208 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421424735493 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034349018239 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0675427539816 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410910738793 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.