Some people think that schools should choose students according to their academic abilities, while others think it is better to have students of different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion?
From the ancient time to this day, education is an integral part of human civilisation, which foster society's development. Because of its importance, there are always different arguments revolving around this area. One of them is related to students' abilities and school specifications. There is a divergence of opinions about this issue whether schools choose students depending on their academic competencies or have all of them to study together. This essay will throw some light on both notions and give my viewpoint.
To commence, there are some reasons for those who advocate the former opinion. They believe that schools having students with particular academic abilities will provide a better and more specialised curriculum. The educational board might focus on specific domains and channel resources into improving the facilities and courses' content that cultivate youngster's academic qualities. As a result, students will have a good environment to fully develop their abilities. In the same line, schools might find it much easier to organise and manage the teaching system for those who are not good in study as others. There are many students with limited capabilities in literacy, communication, or comprehension that need special supports. Hence, choosing students according to their academic abilities might benefit both students and schools in various ways.
However, we cannot lose sight of educational diversity's advantages. Having students of different academic capabilities studying together will create a diverse environment for youngsters to develop. Many experts affirm the study environment as a stimulus for people to thrive. Leaners with various competencies could support each other while studying. One's academic strength could be a weakness to another; therefore, they could give friends a hand to not only tighten relationship but also broaden their horizons. Another point to strengthen this viewpoint is a well-rounded education. When schools have to deal with different qualities, the board must design a comprehensive and completed curriculum. Obviously, students studying at these schools will have an opportunity to enlarge their knowledge and improve their skills in a wide range of subjects.
By and large, I pen down that both opinions have their own rationales. Schools with specific academic abilities or a variety of competencies will benefit students in different aspects. Hence, depending on the schools' visions and students purposes and appropriate decisions should be made.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65789473684 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95801179765 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563157894737 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2511779003 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4782608696 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5217391304 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91304347826 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390942666994 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108527591204 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921614221745 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251212809577 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467228778117 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.