Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems. What are the problems? What could be done to solve those problems?
In this population explosion period, almost all governments focus on space optimization to save land for constructing houses, buildings, and offices. A popular strategy that relates to traffic is sharing carriageways for vehicles, such as bikes and cars. As far as I am concerned, this brings many detrimental effects to the traffic system. This essay will throw some light on this concept and suggest a couple of solutions.
To commence, we need to look at the fact that cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause several problems. First, the most inevitable one is traffic congestion. When there is a wide range of transportation types using the same street, especially a small one, the traffic system could be overloaded. In particular, bikes and cars do not have similar speeds extend as well as the operation. As a result, their movements in the street are considerably different which does not benefit the whole system's smoothness. For example, when cyclists travel at a low speed, they can interrupt the movements of many cars behind them. Secondly, sharing the same carriageways for both bicycles and cars can lead to collisions in which travelers might encounter some fatal accidents. As cars' speed is much faster than bikes' one, the traffic accident can be worse.
In the same line with these discussions, there are some promising solutions. At first, the government could channel resources into expanding roads and dividing them into different carriageways for the distinct assortment of transportation. Even though this choice could take a large space, the safety of citizens should be put in priority. In case of lacking space for expansion, authorities can consider confining time for cyclists and car drivers in using the same road. For example, travelers with bicycles can use the road from 6 a.m. to 8 a.m. and those with cars can share the street from 8 a.m. to 10 a.m. Furthermore, traffic wardens can stand in the road to control the transport system and ensure it run smoothly.
By and large, I reckon that traffic congestion and accidents are two main common problems when cyclists and car drivers share the same road. In terms of solutions, the government can apply different implements, such as expanding roads, applying time restrictions, and having people controlling the system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this population explosion period, almost all governments focus on space op...
^^
Line 2, column 508, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'systems'' or 'system's'?
Suggestion: systems'; system's
...ferent which does not benefit the whole systems smoothness. For example, when cyclists ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 710, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'runs'?
Suggestion: runs
...trol the transport system and ensure it run smoothly. By and large, I reckon that ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i reckon, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11842105263 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82982116248 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547368421053 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2226728232 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.368421053 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47368421053 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233466841139 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698476101411 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781754731212 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136537368013 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656199307678 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.