The table below shows the number of visitors in the UK and their average spending from 2003 to 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given reason table goes back to the period from 2003 to 2008 and covers data on the UK's tourism, specialising in visitors and spending aspects.
Firstly, it is clear that the number of travellers in Great Britain significantly mounted up over the five-year period. This data started at 24.715 million in 2003, then increased by 32.62% to 32.778 million in 2007. In the last presented year, the UK underwent a slight decrease in the number of visitors, which is 2.74%.
In terms of visitors' spending, there is a considerable growth between 2003 and 2008. In 2003, tourists spared a total of £11.855 in the UK, which equals £476 billion per visit. After three years, these figures gradually climbed up to £16.002 and £4.8 billion, respectively. In the next two years, visitors' expenditure in the UK experienced a slight rise to £16.323 while average spending reached a peak of £511 billion.
Lastly, the table represents the data on average nights per visit. Between 2003 and 2006, this figure did not see a big difference, ranging from 8.2 nights to 8.4 nights. However, it suddenly declined to 7.7 nights in 2007 and remained stable until 2008.
Overall, in the UK, while the number of travellers and the amount of money spent generally underwent an upward trend, data on average nights per visit saw a downward tendency from 2003 to 2008.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...siderable growth between 2003 and 2008. In 2003, tourists spared a total of £11.85...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94759825328 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57852774352 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589519650655 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8325123053 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4166666667 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229539293006 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082785980964 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603707568898 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135235975241 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531268238577 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.