school children are becoming far too dependent on computers. this is having an alarm effect on reading and writing skills. teachers need to avoid using computers in the classroom at all costs and go back to teaching basic study skills
However the traditional education system is both practical and efficient, living in modern society needs some advanced trains such as understanding computers, and working with them. It doesn’t seem logical to eliminate them, and back to focusing just on reading and writing. I highly disagree with this view, and in my mind, the school must be based on basic and advanced skills.
Modern life is based on computers and gadgets. They penetrate on our life deeply and they could make undeniable changes in work and personal life, and it is obvious that the definition of literate has been changed too. At present just enabling to read and write aren’t considered as a literate person. Computers gain a dominant role, and most of the tasks are done by them. Although basic skills are imperative, computers can’t be used instead of them, they aren’t able to respond to today’s requirement totally.
Actually, the world is in the progression route, and it has been changing in any scopes. The progression is not only incredible but also inevitable. By this look, the just trained individual can come along with it. Earning ability to work computers is one of these abilities. Since most of the employment prospects are more accessible to trained individuals, who are taught to work with computers, and it will be more visible in the coming years. I think schools must not omit them. In spite of dependency on computers, their roles aren’t negligible.
In overall, however, students are becoming dependent on computers, they are necessary for living in modern society. If schools eliminate computers from school and go back to the traditional method, the student will be faced with an array of problems in the future for finding a job even for doing ordinary chores. So I think it is impossible and I disagree with backing to the basic system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
However the traditional education system is bot...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, so, i think, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06796116505 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81616256049 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566343042071 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.880965267 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05555555556 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186373304389 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530061961884 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335310841037 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109371363653 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300071717124 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.