For schoolchildren, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent, do you agree or disagree?
Different people will exert distinct profound impacts on one’s character formation, mental growth and future life. An opinion is that teachers have more significant impact on one’s IQ and EQ compared to parents. Basically, I side with the point, but the impact of parents can never be ignored.
For a start, as for students, since one/tenth of their life are spent in the classrooms, teachers will influence subtly their cultivation of study habits. Further, educators usually excel in professional knowledge, have deeper insight into the common sense of education, thus, they can help learners excel academically. Last, it is the obligation of educators to guide students on how to communicate and associate with their peers in a proper way. More precisely, one’s social skills could be fostered and developed with the assistance and guidance of teachers.
Nonetheless, it is groundless to believe that parents have little roles to play in children’s social ability and academic performance. First, parents, in most cases, know better about their kids and are instinctively willing to devote their love to the development of their children. In this case, some talented ones could successfully in helping their kids do better academically. Also, a high percentage of parents will teach their child to respect the old and mix with their peers. Considering this statement, parents exercise a marked effect on their children’s social development.
In conclusion, under no circumstances can we ignore the indispensable roles parents could play. Overall, both teachers and educators have a vital influence. However, one schooling starts, teachers may have more impact.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...municate and associate with their peers in a proper way. More precisely, one's social skil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, thus, as for, in conclusion, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56370656371 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0534023486 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629343629344 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3837675961 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321667559019 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104634487328 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086087894765 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174227201464 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985808499166 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.