Increasing travel between countries enable people to learn different cultures or to increase tension between people from different countries.
The dramatic increase in transnational travel in recent years has sparked controversy. Some people are concerned that the upsurge in new arrivals will promote local hostility against visitors, instead of promoting their understanding on mutual cultural background. This notion should be rejected as one can see many factors in favor of this development between countries.
The first reason why international travels would never bring conflicts is rooted in the fact that both locals and visitors are economically motivated. International travel opens opportunities for business development throughout the world. Entrepreneurs are not only interested in domestic market but also oversea market. Foreigners should aware of one country’s culture before winning over the local people. In turn, the locals should show their hospitability to visitors in return for their trust. They share a view that acceptance of each other’s cultural background is crucial condition for cooperation.
Understanding a culture has other implications. Differences in social background, cultural values and religious belief might make the discrepancy of travelers and local inhabitants on some issues indelible, however, the higher interaction, the higher level of communication and understanding. Cuba, for example, used to consider Americans as their foes. Now, they have solid relations with each other in many fields. In the initial stages, their divergence seemed inherent but over time, with better mutual understanding, they share the same ideas on many issues.
According to above analysis, we can observe that the increase in the transnational travel should not be taken as the cause of any conflict that arises between two countries. Alternatively, one should recognize its role in improving mutual understanding between two nations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.843866171 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18239932365 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628252788104 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.4779887055 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.25 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8125 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188453756139 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508130606976 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479458016389 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11234642679 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531787004933 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.