Scientists agree that people are damaging their health by eating too much junk food. Some people think that the answer to this problem is to educate people. Others think education will not work. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent times, overeating processed food is undermining people’s health. It is often said that the situation should be dealt with by raising consumers’ awareness through education, while others argue that it is improbable. In my perspective, I agree that educating is ineffective and will discuss both points in this essay.
On the one hand, educating people can partly solve the issue. Exposing adverse effects of junk food on their health helps them to realize its harm and acquire adequate knowledge of nourishing food. For example, when consumers are provided with information about food-related illnesses resulting from unhealthy food such as overweight, heart disease and high blood pressure, they may stop using it. Additionally, the educational approach is simpler than other ones. Governments do not need to take different solutions into consideration, such as regulating the food industry or using zoning laws to change local food environments which may be complicated and objected by the public to alleviate the situation.
On the other hand, I am convinced that people are more unlikely to refrain from using fast food by being educated. Firstly, junk food generally has eye-catching appearance and tastiness that immediately fascinate consumers. It is scientifically proven that sugar in processed food offers the hallmarks of addiction, for instance, withdrawal and craving, so just by educating, it is insurmountable. Secondly, junk food offers much greater convenience compared to home-cooked meals. Due to the increasingly rapid pace of life,
consumers usually opt to buy fast food rather than making food themselves, though they may be aware of destructive impacts of processed food to their health.
To recapitulate, educating is not a conceivable way to address the problem. Governments should tackle the issue by alternative actions
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57192982456 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12049194692 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656140350877 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6814098468 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.866666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246519013768 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086127611695 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600812686574 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130981412093 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523665301164 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.