Scientists have reported that junk foods are detrimental to health. Some people believe that education is the answer to this problem, but others disagree.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Most people from each society lately tend to eat out and the popularity of so called convenient food has become like an epidemic worldwide. As a result, health problems, ranging from simple indigestion to serious ones like diabetes, hypertension and obesity have been on the rise. To reverse such worsening trends, some activists are calling for publicizing sensible eating habits and balanced diets.
Of course, it is crucial that the administrations, health experts and dietitians take active role in advising citizens of the much-needed information of what a healthy diet includes. Obviously, this should start at schools, where young children can be made aware of the dangers of fast food and carbonated drinks. What is more, the adults should also be trained in making a conscious effort of choosing what they intake and how to prepare nutritious meals. This is especially vital for parents and potential parents who dictate what the whole family should eat. Consequently, in the long run, health education will make a huge difference.
On the other hand, I am not convinced that our physical and mental health can completely be secured by recognizing what and how we should eat only. What if highly educated and perfectly informed individuals couldn’t resist the temptation of oily French fries, juicy hamburgers and sugar packed Coca-Cola? Then, the other ways to combat the junk food in questions require measures, such as imposing age-limits on fast-food consumption, taxing the fast-food outlets and raising the health insurance for over-weight fast-food addicts. Only then will the obsession of processed food be effectively discouraged or halted.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, so, then, of course, such as, as a result, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36641221374 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88394077388 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690839694656 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4218636461 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.166666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187984254488 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593423625147 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240966529858 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114625490863 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311333618714 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.