Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development?
It is true that some people think that human should have a global language in the future. Although there are some drawbacks of using a single language, I believe that there are far more benefits of social growth.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why speaking the same language could have negative impacts. Firstly, all countries would be loss of cultural and traditional values which is one of the biggest disadvantages on society. For example, the increasing popularity of English movies has significantly affected the lives of almost young people in Vietnam. They prefer to watch western films than locally produced films that might be the collapse of film industries in Vietnam due to the lack of audience. Secondly, using a single language causes the fall of tourism because there would be no reason to travel for meeting and learning about new cultures if all countries had the same language and similar cultures. This could damage many countries economically that are the most depend on income from tourism.
On the other hand, I believe that this trend could have some benefits on social development. One reason for this view is that a common language might facilitate the communication which contribute to boost in tourism. People could be easier travel around the world and go to places that speak different languages before. This is because, they would be complete understanding all cultures throughout the world. Another reason is that one language would help economic growth, especially multinational companies, business trade and global cooperation. For instance, companies like Samsung, Honda are easier trade between other companies. As a result, it leads to better performance of the employees and the company.
In conclusion, I think that a global language will have both advantages and disadvantages on social development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26599326599 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77427184118 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548821548822 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3368169052 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.75 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119909264757 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422268853634 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434117503705 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915346440295 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311174969983 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.