In the modern world, people no longer need to use food or products from animals, such as medicine and clothing. Do you agree or disagree with that statement?
In the modern world, people do not have the demands of food and products which are produced from animals such as medicine and clothing. I totally agree with this statement.
The consumption of products without using animal ingredients have several positive impacts on the environment and health. One reason for this view is that there is a variety of product resources from natural sources, plants and artificiality. Currently, clothes are made from cotton materials or PE materials and drugs use from herbal. In the future, the development of science and technology might discover and invent new materials instead of animals.
Another reason is that, animal food products have some negative effects on human health. If people eat too much animal food such as meats, poultry, eggs and milk, they would be overweight easily and increase the risk of obesity, diabetes, and heart diseases. By contrast, vegetarian diets focus on plant-based food as the main nutrients. Therefore, they have lower cholesterol levels than normal people. As a result, they will avoid obesity or stroke and increase lifespan.
Finally, when people reduce the use of food or products from animals and replace with alternative product sources, this has a huge number of advantages on environment and ecosystem. People can prevent animal from illegal hunting and limit the extinction of them. If most people do not eat animal food, it is unnecessary to kill animal for food. This will contribute to increase ecosystem diversity in the world.
In conclusion, it is not necessary to consume food and products which are made from animals, because people have many alternative sources. For the reasons mentioned above, I believe that there are a large number of benefits when people cut out the consumption of animal products.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 198, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ntioned above, I believe that there are a large number of benefits when people cut out the consum...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24137931034 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67985837381 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565517241379 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5380771576 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4117647059 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317112617675 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101013833313 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974939399687 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210687131294 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143707014448 0.056905535591 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.