Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both these views and give your opinion?
It is true that people have different views about employees should work for only one company or different companies in all their career. While some people believe that staying in a business bring a lot of advantages, I would argue that it is better to work for different businesses all their working life.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why people should stay at one company during their career. Firstly, the workers could advancement opportunities at their organization. This is because when they work for the same company for a long time, they will gain long-term experience, wide knowledge and skills. As a result, they can have opportunities to advance their position at team or department at their company. Secondly, the employees are extremely loyal with their organization, so they do not have any ideas about they will quit their jobs and they can devote their working life for the development of business. For instance, some Japanese often work in a company until their retirement age.
On the other hand, I believe that when people change anther organizations in their working life, that will bring several benefits for them. One reason for this view is that the workers will have chance to learn and improve their knowledge and new skills about a variety fields of company. For example, some young people are more likely to switch jobs and stay at one business in a short period time, because they want to continue to learn and grow through training courses in the business. Another reason is that they want to find better environmental workplace which make them feel comfortable to work and devote in the company. If they find an appropriate workplace with good bosses, great colleagues and healthy work environment, they can increase their performance and work efficiently.
In conclusion, while there are some reasons to believe that becoming a longtime employee in one organization have a lot of benefits, I believe that the workers also could move to many different companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...eve that the workers also could move to many different companies.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03293413174 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67333081057 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48502994012 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9118639547 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.071428571 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364218189763 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150507384524 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104056444517 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246332531206 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132367669639 0.056905535591 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.