While analysts claim that there is a high probability of speaking only one language in the course of time, i believe that the existence of the same dialect has overwhelming social advantages than the adverse impacts. This essay will first discuss the inconveniences of communicating in a single global language, and secondly, the two relevant reasons on why using a specific conversation is entirely worthy for communities.
On the one hand, cultural loss is a major drawback when people exclusively speak a particular language. Since the languages usually epitomise the cultural identification of a group or population, culture might die off if we cannot preserve the language, which is generally intimately associated with it. Next, it can affect the business significantly in astounding ways. For illustration, language teachers and translators, who oftentimes impose a hefty fee from the learners, tend to lose loose their decent jobs that could wreck the booming savings of a society. Not only would a common language complicate employments but also it could cause serious collisions among citizens because certainly, everyone is bound to safeguard their original words effectively.
On the other hand, i strongly believe that the communication between two masses would be highly convenient as the language barrier, which is a fundamental ingredient in giving rise to terrible misunderstandings among public, can be broken down readily, subjecting to a smooth flow of information and ideas. Secondly, the economic growth of local associations would flourish if bodies used similar terminologies that would often alleviate articulation hurdles and trade can expand actively between divisional societies. In addition, having one language is a dominant root of foreign currencies for it would grant non native nationalities to express their feelings distinctly, compared to multiple languages, which can leave them in a terrible mess.
In conclusion, presumably, benefits such as immense satisfactions and sound economies ascertain why speaking the same language is the perfect social advancement.
Essay evaluation report
This essay will first discuss the inconveniences of communicating in a single global language, and secondly, the two relevant reasons on why using a specific conversation is entirely worthy for communities.
This essay will discuss firstly the inconveniences of communicating in a single global language, and secondly, the two relevant reasons on why using a specific conversation is entirely worthy for communities.
tend to lose loose their decent jobs
tend to lose their decent jobs
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 317 350
No. of Characters: 1748 1500
No. of Different Words: 210 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.22 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.514 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.132 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 137 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 114 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 90 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.818 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.647 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.727 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.356 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.6 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.088 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...nly one language in the course of time, i believe that the existence of the same ...
^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...fty fee from the learners, tend to lose loose their decent jobs that could wreck the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65299684543 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21326475811 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662460567823 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.4502390811 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.909090909 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8181818182 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0881636552121 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352795657772 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426791944867 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691133289895 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052497550663 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.