Folks are able to purchase similar products in spite of the locations in the globe as nations have become more and more homogeneous. In my view, this is unquestionably positive advancements. This essay will discuss on how the globalisation remains truly constructive and support my opinion with relevant examples.
To begin with, one of the most visible perfect effects of globalisation is the improved quality of the products because of the fierce competition. Take Adidas items that are readily available in all countries nowadays for an instance. When a new brand enters a country, it usually comes in riding on some goodwill, which it has to live up to. At the same time, domestic companies are bound to fight out foreign investors, which enables native companies to raise their standards and improve the satisfaction levels of customers. So it leads to the survival of the fittest state, subjecting ultimately both backers to develop characteristic products. In addition, not only would globalisation lead to fierce contentions but also it would compel exotic nations to lower the prices of the production.
Next, thanks again to globalisation, culture enhancement is another remarkable benefit. Sushi, popular Japanese food, would be a good example. If you travel anywhere in the world, you will find Sushi restaurants effortlessly. Therefore, it is clear that the given Japanese food has suited perfectly in foreign culture, making the world more identical and expanding the economy. Furthermore, people are achieving sheer happiness since they are able to enjoy the same products like Apple electronics, Nike wearings, Honda automobiles and so on regardless of the nations. These global products were entirely limited to the developed nations like the USA and Japan before the globalisation era. However, owing to the free increasing interaction of people and countries, people have finally found contentment.
In conclusion, with the consideration of sound goods, fostering culture and intense delight, presumably, globalisation is a worthwhile development.
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
better to develop the negative side in the second paragraph, and then supporting side in the third paragraph. since the topic is: Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 319 350
No. of Characters: 1704 1500
No. of Different Words: 203 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.226 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.342 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.984 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 128 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 108 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 71 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.765 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.122 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.588 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.278 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.474 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.046 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in my view, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5078369906 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1039801957 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655172413793 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8869197101 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.352941176 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250888916203 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600279734073 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686743315604 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120023156117 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942956949115 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.